CATHY G. HIGGINS | Links to my personal and professional pages |
|||||
| HOME THINK-ICT-BLOG RESEARCH RESUME PERSONAL-BLOG ABOUT | |||||
|
Digital Portfolios in Middle School: References
Ahn, J. (2004).
Electronic portfolios: Blending technology, accountability & assessment. T
H E Journal, 31(9), 12-18. American Library
Association. (1989, January 10). Presidential
committee on information literacy: Final report. Retrieved Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2004). The effect of electronic scaffolding for technology integration on
perceived task effort and confidence of primary student teachers. Journal
of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 29-43. Retrieved
Baggott la Velle, L., McFarlane, A., &
Brawn, R. (2003). Knowledge transformation through ICT in science
education: A case study in teacher-driven curriculum development-Case-Study 1. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 183-199. Retrieved
Barrett, H. (2000, April). Create your own
electronic portfolio: Using off-the-shelf software to show case your own or
student work. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(7), 14-21.
Retrieved September 30, 2006 from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications/LL/LLIssues/ Barrett, H. (2005). White paper: Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement.
Retrieved Baum, J. J. (2005, November/December). CyberEthics: The new frontier. TechTrends:
Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 49(6), 54-78. Retrieved BellSouth. (2003).
The growing technology gap between schools and
students. BellSouth Corporation, BellSouth Foundation. Retrieved Boekhorst, A.K., & Britz, J.J. (2004).
Information literacy at school level: A comparative study between the Breivik, P. S.
(2005). 21st century learning and information literacy.
Change, 37(2),
20-27. Retrieved Center for Media Literacy
(2005). Media literacy: A definition . and more. Retrieved Christa McAuliffe
Technology Conference (2007). Conference Web Site.
Retrieved on Conrad, L., & Bowie,
C. (2006). The impact of context on readings of
teaching portfolios. International Journal for Academic Development, 11(1),
31-42. Retrieved Dysthe, O., & Engelsen, K. (2004).
Portfolios and assessment in teacher education in Educational Testing
Service. (2002). Digital
transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. Eisner, E.W. (1997). The enlightened eye: Qualitative research inquiry and the enhancement
of educational practices. Eshet-Alkali, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y.
(2004). Experiments in digital literacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 70(4),
421-429. Retrieved Freidman, T. (2006).
The world is flat: A brief history of the
twenty-first century. Gall, M., Gall, J., & & Borg, W.
(2003). Educational research: An introduction. Gibbs, H. J. (2004, May). Student
portfolios: Documenting success. Techniques: Connection Education &
Careers, 79(5), 27-31. Retrieved Gregorian, N. (2006).
Eye on research: Media literacy and core curriculum. Threshold Magazine. Retrieved Hewett, S. (2004). Improving instructional
practices. TechTrends: Linking
Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 48(5), 26-30. Retrieved International Association
for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (n.d.). IEA
SITES-M2 case reports. Retrieved International Association
for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2005). IEA SITES 2006 study outline. Retrieved International Society for
Technology in Education. (2000). National educational
technology standards for students. Retrieved Johnson, C. (2006, February). Enabling all students to learn science. Science Teacher, 73(2), 32-37. Kelly, M.G., Haber,
J. (2006). National educational
technology standards for students: Resources for student assessment. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information
resource in k-12 education: strategies for supporting students in searching and
processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285-328.
Retrieved Lemke, C. (2002). EnGauge
21st century skills: Digital literacies for a digital age. North Central Regional Educational Lab.
Retrieved Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic
consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D.
Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.) Handbook
of reading research, volume III (pp. 743-770). Levin, D. & Arafeh,
S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy
students and their schools. Ma, H. (2005). Interpreting middle school
students' online experiences: A phenomenological approach. (Doctoral dissertation, Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative
research (3rd ed.). Mullin, J. (1998). Portfolios: Purposeful
collections of student work. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 74, 79-88. New Hampshire Department
of Education. (2006, April 6). Technical Advisory
#2. Retrieved New Hampshire Department
of Education. (2007). The New Media Consortium.
(2005). A global imperative: The report of
the 21st century literacy summit. Retrieved Newmann, F., Bryk, A., & Nagaoka,
J. (2001). Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict
or coexistence? Consortium on Niguidula, D. (2003). Ways technology can
improve assessment and accountability. In D.T. Gordon (Ed.), Better Teaching and Learning in the Digital
Classroom. (pp. 27-39). Niguidula, D. (2005, November). Documenting learning with digital portfolios. Educational
Leadership, 63(3), 44-47. Retrieved Niguidula, D. (2006). Whose portfolio is
it, anyway? In A. Jafari, C.
Kaufman (Ed.) Handbook of Research on ePortfolios.
(pp. 494-500). Olsen, S. (2006, August 10). Digital kids:
Parents shaky about kids' safety online. CNET News.
Retrieved Oros, L., Morgenegg, J., & Finger, A.
(1998, January/February). Creating digital portfolios.
Media & Methods, 34(3), 15. Retrieved Partnership for 21st
Century Skills. (n.d.)
Framework for 21st century learning.
Retrieved Pink, D. (2005). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. Plucker, J. & Quaglia, R. (1998). The student aspirations
survey: Assessing student effort and goals. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, 58(2), 252-258. Retrieved Quaglia Institute for
Student Aspirations. (2006). My Voice Student
Aspirations Survey. Retrieved Quaglia Institute for
Student Aspirations. (2007). My Voice Student Aspirations Survey: Quellmalz, E. & Kozma, R. (2003). Designing assessment of learning with technology. Assessment
in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(3), 389-408. Retrieved Ravid, R. (2000).
Practical Statistics for Educators (2nd ed.). Robins, J. (2006). Electronic
portfolios as a bridge. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42(2),
107-113. Retrieved Rolheiser, C., Bower, B., & Stevahn, L.
(2000). The portfolio organizer:
Succeeding with portfolios in your classroom. Sharma, M., Stewart, C.,
& Prosser, M. (2004). On the use of
phenomenography in the analysis of qualitative data. American
Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, 720(1), 41-44. Retrieved Solomon, G. (1993, November/December). Panning for gold. Electronic Learning, 13(3), 20-21. Retrieved Tally, B., &
Goldenberg, L. (2005). Fostering historical thinking
with digitized primary sources. Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 38(1), 1-21. Retrieved United Nations
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2006). Using ICT to develop literacy. Retrieved
Wang, S. (2004). Learning experiences in developing electronic
portfolios in a master's educational technology program: A case study. (Doctoral dissertation, Webb, G. (1997). Deconstructing deep and
surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography. Higher Education, 33,
195-212. Retrieved Wiedmer, T. L.
(1998, April). Digital portfolios. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(8), 586-589. Wilkerson, J., & Lang, W. (2003,
December 3). Portfolios, the Pied Piper of teacher certification assessments:
Legal and psychometric issues. Education Policy Analysis
Archives, 11(45). Retrieved Woodward, H., & Nanlohy,
P. (2004a, July). Digital portfolios in pre-service teacher
education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &
Practice, 11(2), 167-178. Woodward, H., & Nanlohy, P. (2004b, April). Digital Portfolios: Fact or Fashion? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 227-238. |
|||||